@article{lupton_you_2026,

title = {‘You can’t put the cat back in the bag once it's out’: Australians’ understandings, practices and imaginaries concerning generative AI},

author = {Deborah Lupton and Bronwyn Bailey-Charteris},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20539517261442430},

doi = {10.1177/20539517261442430},

issn = {2053-9517, 2053-9517},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-06-01},

urldate = {2026-04-20},

journal = {Big Data \& Society},

volume = {13},

number = {2},

pages = {20539517261442430},

abstract = {Since their introduction in late 2022, generative AI applications have proliferated as Big Tech companies seek to encourage widespread adoption from the public. This article reports on the findings from exploratory qualitative research conducted in mid-2025 with Australian adults about their knowledge, everyday practices and imaginaries related to generative AI. Nearly all participants, regardless of their age, gender, ethnicity or geographical location, had experimented with generative AI applications, and many had incorporated them into their quotidian routines. However, far from being enchanted by these technologies, these Australians saw them as little more than mundane software that was now pervasive and therefore unavoidable. Generative AI was described as offering useful tools or helpers for achieving better efficiency, time-saving, and productivity in accomplishing routine tasks at home and work. Most participants were aware that the tools frequently generated incorrect information, and therefore required checking, but seemed largely untroubled about this. They expressed concerns about the impacts of possibilities of fake information, scams and data privacy issues, and the loss of learning or critical thinking that generative AI use could cause. However, participants also expressed feelings of powerlessness over what they could do to avoid using generative AI in the face of the determination by Big Tech \textendash and in some cases, employers and educational institutions \textendash to promote its use. More profound negative impacts were mostly recounted as abstract or as potential problems in a future world if generative AI development by Big Tech was allowed to progress unchecked.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{dewi_vernacular_2026,

title = {Vernacular infrastructuring: Rethinking linguistic agency of minority‐language speakers in multilingual digital environment},

author = {Udiana Puspa Dewi},

url = {https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jola.70038},

doi = {10.1111/jola.70038},

issn = {1055-1360, 1548-1395},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-05-01},

urldate = {2026-01-14},

journal = {Journal of Linguistic Anthropology},

volume = {36},

number = {1},

pages = {e70038},

abstract = {Abstract 

 This article introduces the concept of vernacular infrastructuring to examine how speakers of minoritized languages navigate multilingual digital environments. Building on notion of vernacular creativity and extending insights from linguistic anthropology, I conceptualize infrastructuring as the everyday negotiation of institutional norms, platform logics, and user practices that structure linguistic visibility. Drawing on the case of 

 Nanti Kita Sambat tentang Hari Ini 

 (NKSTHI), a popular Instagram and X account that reimagines the Javanese speech genre 

 sambat 

 (“to complain”), I show how users creatively mobilize Javanese to perform cultural intimacy while tactically responding to algorithmic imaginaries. I argue that vernacular infrastructuring operates through three entangled layers: institutional infrastructures (historical hierarchies of language policy and media), perceived platform infrastructures (folk theories and algorithmic imaginaries), and user practices (stylization, code‐mixing, and affective design). Through this layered analysis, the paper demonstrates that vernacular practices are not merely expressive but infrastructurally strategic forms of discursive value work, referring to the speakers' reflexivity to assign and contest linguistic value. By foregrounding the agentive tactics of minoritized users, vernacular infrastructuring contributes to ongoing debates in linguistic anthropology on language, media, and infrastructure, showing how digital platforms actively participate in the revaluation of linguistic diversity. 

 , 

 Abstrak 

 Artikel menika ngenalaken teori “praktik infrastruktur vernakular” kagem mahami cara penutur basa minoritas menavigasi lingkungan digital multibahasa. Kanthi dasar gagasan bab kreativitas vernakular lan nambah kawruh saking linguistik antropologi, kula njabaraken konsep “infrastruktur” minangka negosiasi norma kelembagaan, logika platform, lan praktik panganggenan platform digital ingkang mbentuk visibilitas linguistik. Sangking kasus Nanti Kita Sambat Tentang Hari Ini (NKSTHI), akun instagram lan X babagan “sambat”, kula nedahi pangangge kaliyan mobilisasi kreatif basa jawi kangge nampilaken keintiman budaya merespon imajinasi algoritmik. Kula nggadahi pemanggih menawi infrastruktur vernakular kedah nglangkungi tigang lapisan kekait: infrastruktur kelembagaan (hierarki historis kebijakan basa lan media), infrastruktur platform ingkang dipersepsikan (teori rakyat lan imajinasi algoritmik), lan praktik pangangge basa (stilisasi, campur kode, lan desain afektif). Liwat analisis berlapis puniki, kula nunjukaken menawi praktik vernakular sanes naming ekspresif, ananging bentuk‐bentuk strategis infrastruktural saking nilai sosial ingkang gadhah sipat diskursif, ingkang ngrujuk ing refleksivitas penutur lebet netepaken lan memperdebatkan nilai sosial basa. Kanthi ngutamaaken taktik agensi pengguna basa minoritas, teori infrastruktur vernakular gadhahi kontribusi ing perdebatan teori lebeting bidang linguistik antropologi bab basa, media, lan infrastruktur, nedahaken kados pundi platform digital tumut gadhahi peran lebet revaluasi karagaman basa ing jagad digital.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{matich_authenticity_2026,

title = {Authenticity controversies: Witness media and generative AI imagery},

author = {Phoebe Matich and Michael Richardson and Jean Burgess},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01634437261442039},

doi = {10.1177/01634437261442039},

issn = {0163-4437, 1460-3675},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-04-01},

urldate = {2026-04-27},

journal = {Media, Culture \& Society},

pages = {01634437261442039},

abstract = {This article explores how AI-generated content reconfigures struggles over authenticity in witness media. Media witnessing is traditionally understood as a relational field of practice involving the performance through media of testimony to oppression and violence, where the testimony must both be genuine and carry democratic weight. As AI-generated content circulates in and around global conflicts, concern deepens about misinformation, given AIGC’s perceived lack of an “indexical” relationship to reality. This article acknowledges but goes beyond the misinformation frame, instead focusing on two recent cases to show how multimodal AI may represent human experiences of conflict in nuanced and ambivalent ways, unsettling contemporary assumptions about media witnessing and the mechanisms through which it happens. We present a comparative analysis of two controversies around AI-generated content that foreground authenticity debates, informed by STS, witnessing and journalism studies research. These controversies demonstrate that, by subordinating indexicality to iconic or analogical representation, AI-generated content resists established witnessing norms, yielding questions about media functions, ethics, and power relations.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{thomson_news_2026,

title = {News audiences’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence in journalism: a use case study across three domains},

author = {T. J. Thomson and Ryan J. Thomas and Hannes Cools and Rachael Anderson and Rebecca Venema and Oscar Toohey and Caroline Gardam and Edina Strikovic and Michelle Riedlinger and Jean Burgess},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1329878X261441933},

doi = {10.1177/1329878X261441933},

issn = {1329-878X, 2200-467X},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-04-01},

urldate = {2026-04-27},

journal = {Media International Australia},

pages = {1329878X261441933},

abstract = {News audiences’ acceptance of generative AI (GenAI) in journalism is shaped by their knowledge of (or direct experience with) what AI is, what it can do, and what implications its use has. Acknowledging this, the present study draws on the technology acceptance model to first explore what a sample of news audiences in two countries knows about GenAI and what their experiences, if any, with it have been to date. Next, it explores this sample's acceptance of use cases that demonstrate how AI is \textendash or could be \textendash used in journalism. It does this by using in-depth interviews with 60 participants to introduce or re-introduce 23 use cases to them and ask them how accepting they are of journalists using each. Acceptance depended on how AI was used, how transparent the use was, whether the use impacted accuracy, and whether legal and other ethical considerations were appropriately attended to.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{giami_sexual_2026,

title = {Sexual Justice and the Future of Sexual Rights: A Call to Action},

author = {Alain Giami and Esther Corona and Lisa Welsh and Ricardo Hernandez Forcada and Zahra Stardust and Md. Sharful Islam Khan and Magaly Pirotte and Richard G. Parker and Shereen El Feki and Amaranta G\'{o}mez Regalado and Denise Medico and Agata Loewe Kurilla and Luis Perelman and Ren\'{e} De Klerk and Erick Janssen and Pedro Nobre and Elna Rudolph},

url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19317611.2026.2655809},

doi = {10.1080/19317611.2026.2655809},

issn = {1931-7611, 1931-762X},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-04-01},

urldate = {2026-04-28},

journal = {International Journal of Sexual Health},

pages = {1\textendash22},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{whelan-shamy_simulation_2026,

title = {Simulation and the epistemology of transformer models: operational similarity through sustained difference},

author = {Daniel Whelan-Shamy},

url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00146-026-03004-x},

doi = {10.1007/s00146-026-03004-x},

issn = {0951-5666, 1435-5655},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-04-01},

urldate = {2026-04-22},

journal = {AI \& SOCIETY},

abstract = {Abstract 

 Extending simulation beyond its usual semiotic application, this article steps through the process by which Large Language Models (LLMs) reproduce similarity, to argue that simulation produces a “doubling” effect: an operational similarity sustained through difference. Accordingly, this article draws on literary theory to “read” transformer models with the intent of understanding how they operate as an infrastructure for the production of linguistic similarity. It is argued that neural networks enact an epistemology of exchange in which tokenisation, vectorisation, and self-attention render language commensurable, thereby producing an operational similarity that manifests differently in each natural language response generated. The political and epistemic implications of doubling are thereafter discussed with reference to the relationship between simulation, models and subjectivity.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{floreani_platforming_2026,

title = {Platforming landlords: A critical trend analysis of rental housing technology in Australia and beyond},

author = {Samantha Floreani and Jathan Sadowski},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02637758261441138},

doi = {10.1177/02637758261441138},

issn = {0263-7758, 1472-3433},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-04-01},

urldate = {2026-04-15},

journal = {Environment and Planning D: Society and Space},

pages = {02637758261441138},

abstract = {This article advances a critical analysis of digital technologies in rental housing by drawing out five trends in the Australian ‘RentTech’ market and placing them in direct relation with shared political-economic imperatives that transcend borders and underpins the development of rental technologies around the world. By situating Australian examples within a wider context, we draw connections across seemingly disparate dynamics. We show how service integration across the value chain (Trend 1) leverages rentier models to accumulate data rents (Trend 2), which facilitates value extraction from rental assets (Trend 3) and supports risk management imperatives through moral evaluation of renters (Trend 4), all of which are in service of consolidation in the private rental market (Trend 5). Together, these interlocking dynamics describe how RentTech is both 

 responding 

 to housing financialisation and shared logics of property and data assetisation, while also actively 

 shaping 

 its future direction. Our aim is to analyse patterns that exist within and across markets for RentTech to better understand how this sector is developing in different global and national contexts. We conclude by arguing that there are key points of convergence between international markets and shared imperatives that inform the current state and trajectory of technologies in rental housing.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{binns_media-materialist_2026,

title = {A media-materialist method for interpreting generative AI images},

author = {Daniel Binns},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13548565261441949},

doi = {10.1177/13548565261441949},

issn = {1354-8565, 1748-7382},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-04-01},

urldate = {2026-04-13},

journal = {Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies},

pages = {13548565261441949},

abstract = {This article proposes a four-layer media-materialist method for interpreting AI-generated images as cultural-computational artefacts that bear archaeologically readable traces of their production conditions. Drawing on media materialism’s focus on technological processes rather than content alone, the method analyses dataset (training materials), model (computational processing), interface (user mediation), and prompt (linguistic inscription) as interdependent layers that encode distinct biases and constraints into visual outputs. Through detailed analysis of two major training datasets \textendash the human-curated Wikipedia-based Image-Text Dataset and the algorithmically scored LAION-Aesthetics \textendash and sample image analyses, the method reveals how cultural assumptions become statistically compressed into archetypal arrangements. Abstract prompts like ‘intellectual rigor’ materialise through embedded echoes of academic masculinity, complete with books, globes, and contemplative poses, while platform interfaces create aesthetic path dependencies that systematically shape creative possibilities. The method works both diagnostically (with known metadata) and archaeologically (when original prompts are unknown), demonstrating how visual traces can be read backwards to understand the infrastructural pressures that shaped an image’s generation. This media-materialist approach treats AI images as both medium and artefact, revealing how centuries of visual culture become probabilistically recombined through computational inference. The framework exposes how training data biases, model architectures, interface designs, and prompt conventions collaborate to produce images that appear spontaneous but are actually shaped by layered technological and cultural constraints. Rather than dismissing AI outputs as meaningless ‘slop’ or celebrating them as creative breakthroughs, the method provides systematic tools for reading these synthetic images as cultural documents that encode the material conditions of algorithmic production, offering essential literacy for navigating an increasingly synthetic media landscape.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{coghlan_beyond_2026,

title = {Beyond ‘Basic’ AI-Animal Alignment},

author = {Simon Coghlan and Christine Parker},

url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13347-026-01039-y},

doi = {10.1007/s13347-026-01039-y},

issn = {2210-5433, 2210-5441},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-03-01},

urldate = {2026-02-10},

journal = {Philosophy \& Technology},

volume = {39},

number = {1},

pages = {21},

abstract = {Abstract 

 In their article ‘AI Alignment: The Case for Including Animals’, Tse et al. compellingly argue for extending alignment endeavours beyond humans to also protect sentient animals. They call for AI alignment with a ‘basic’ level of animal welfare. Since ‘basic’ alignment carries minimal human cost, they argue, it can be widely accepted and is thus currently more strategically appropriate than is pursuing advanced or ideal alignment with animal welfare. This commentary paper argues that ‘basic’ AI alignment for animals is sometimes insufficient. It makes the case that going beyond basic AI-animal alignment is both feasible and morally required in a variety of circumstances.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{harms_developers_2026,

title = {Developers Are Central for Mitigation of AI Bias},

author = {Rebekah J. Harms and Rachel A. Ankeny and Lucy Carter and Aditi Mankad and Jackie Leach Scully},

url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15265161.2025.2608629},

doi = {10.1080/15265161.2025.2608629},

issn = {1526-5161, 1536-0075},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-02-01},

urldate = {2026-02-22},

journal = {The American Journal of Bioethics},

volume = {26},

number = {2},

pages = {112\textendash114},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{graham_internet_2026,

title = {On the Internet no-one knows you’re not a bot: ‘Botting’ on Reddit as participatory culture},

author = {Timothy Graham and Dominique Carlon},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448251409210},

doi = {10.1177/14614448251409210},

issn = {1461-4448, 1461-7315},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-02-01},

urldate = {2026-02-20},

journal = {New Media \& Society},

pages = {14614448251409210},

abstract = {Repetitive online communication is often labelled a ‘bot problem’ by platforms, policymakers and users. However, repetitive posting does not exclusively indicate automation; humans also engage in bot-like posting for various purposes. We adopt the term ‘botting’ to describe repetitive posting enacted through manual, semi-automated, or fully automated means. While emerging research has linked manual botting practices to commercial or fame-seeking motivations, we extend this scholarship by examining botting on Reddit \textendash a pseudonymous platform that lacks the affordances typically associated with monetisation or personal branding. Through a mixed-methods analysis, we examine a case study in which mass-scale, repetitive posting of the mushroom emoji emerged as ‘in-group’ behaviour within Reddit’s participatory culture, prompting a performative counterpublic response. Our findings challenge the binary between human and automated posting, and underscore the importance of situating research on AI-generated and automated content within the cultural and contextual frameworks that shape its production and reception.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{dehghan_entangled_2026,

title = {The entangled dynamics leading to the sedimentation of polarisation on political Reddit},

author = {Ehsan Dehghan and Dominique Carlon and Kateryna Kasianenko and Ashwin Nagappa and Vish Padinjaredath Suresh},

url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2026.2623523},

doi = {10.1080/1369118X.2026.2623523},

issn = {1369-118X, 1468-4462},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-02-01},

urldate = {2026-02-20},

journal = {Information, Communication \& Society},

pages = {1\textendash24},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{sparrow_against_2026,

title = {Against Imaginary Friends: Why Digital Companions Are No Solution to Social Isolation},

author = {Robert Sparrow and James Brown},

url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3750037},

doi = {10.1145/3750037},

issn = {0001-0782, 1557-7317},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-02-01},

urldate = {2026-02-16},

journal = {Communications of the ACM},

volume = {69},

number = {2},

pages = {60\textendash68},

abstract = {For several decades, some people have suggested that loneliness and social isolation could be reduced by providing older persons with social robots. This project has, to date, failed: Social robots remain expensive, have limited functionality, and are unable to maintain the interest of users. However, a new technology, “digital companions,” looks more plausible. In this article, we extend the criticisms that have been made of social robots to digital companions and identify new dangers associated with the use of digital companions. It 

 is 

 possible that digital companions will allow people to feel less lonely. However, encouraging people to mistake imaginary friends for real friends is prima facie unethical. More importantly, encouraging people to have imaginary friends is no solution to social isolation. Proposals to use digital companions to combat loneliness and social isolation also underestimate the importance of touch, physical companionship, and mutual aid, when it comes to human well-being. 

 , 

 Relationships with "digital humans" might help people feel less lonely. But will this technology increase social isolation?},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{de_paula_mitigating_2026,

title = {Mitigating the Negative Transfer in Multi‐Task Learning for Harmful Language Detection in Spanish and Arabic},

author = {Angel Felipe Magnoss\~{a}o De Paula and Imene Bensalem and Damiano Spina and Paolo Rosso},

url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.70182},

doi = {10.1111/exsy.70182},

issn = {0266-4720, 1468-0394},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-02-01},

urldate = {2026-02-20},

journal = {Expert Systems},

volume = {43},

number = {2},

pages = {e70182},

abstract = {ABSTRACT 

 Negative transfer continues to limit the benefits of multi‐task learning (MTL) in harmful language detection, where related tasks must share representations without diluting task‐specific nuances. We introduce task awareness (TA), a methodological framework that explicitly conditions MTL models on the task they must solve. TA is instantiated through two complementary mechanisms: Task‐aware input (TAI), which augments textual inputs with natural‐language task descriptions, and task embedding (TE), which learns task‐specific transformations guided by a task identification vector. Together they enable the encoder to disentangle shared and task‐dependent signals, reducing interference during joint optimisation. We integrate TA with BETO and AraBERT encoders and evaluate on six Spanish and Arabic datasets covering sexism, toxicity, offensive language, and hate speech. Across cross‐validation and official train‐test splits, TA consistently mitigates negative transfer, surpasses single‐task and conventional MTL baselines, and yields new state‐of‐the‐art scores on EXIST‐2021, HatEval‐2019, and HSArabic‐2023. The proposed methodology therefore combines a principled architectural innovation with demonstrated practical gains for multilingual harmful language detection. The resources to reproduce our experiments are publicly available at 

 https://github.com/AngelFelipeMP/Arabic‐MultiTask‐Learning 

 .},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{kasianenko_elements_2026,

title = {Elements of practices in digital publics: a model for identifying collective doings on social media platforms},

author = {Kateryna Kasianenko},

url = {https://academic.oup.com/ct/article/36/1/1/8307371},

doi = {10.1093/ct/qtaf026},

issn = {1050-3293, 1468-2885},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-02-01},

urldate = {2026-03-03},

journal = {Communication Theory},

volume = {36},

number = {1},

pages = {1\textendash11},

abstract = {Abstract 

 Studies of public communication in digitally networked spaces have increasingly adopted the notion of practice to make sense of patterned doings in such spaces. They have identified and theorized about practices ranging from highly mundane and intimate doings to more collective and organized instances of grassroots platform governance to doings likely to result in harm. Despite this, it remains unclear how doings in networked publics must look, what properties they must have, who needs to engage in them, and for how long, to be considered practices. By synthesizing insights from practice theory and interdisciplinary Internet studies, I develop a model of practices in digital publics and outline interrelated elements of such sustained doings\textemdashaction, language, materiality, collectivity, knowledge, and normativity. This model can enable future empirical studies to define, identify, and differentiate practices more systematically within and across digitally networked spaces and consider their broader impact on digital citizenship.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{rousell_atmospheric_2026,

title = {Atmospheric Wellbeing: Sensing the More-Than-Human Dynamics of Air},

author = {David Rousell and Deborah Lupton},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15327086251387108},

doi = {10.1177/15327086251387108},

issn = {1532-7086, 1552-356X},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-02-01},

urldate = {2026-03-03},

journal = {Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies},

volume = {26},

number = {1},

pages = {3\textendash13},

abstract = {Clean air is vital to bodily, social, and planetary wellbeing. This article develops the concept of ‘atmospheric wellbeing’ as a framework for investigating the more-than-human dynamics of air through its affective and sensory qualities. Engaging the new field of critical air studies, the authors explore creative and multisensory social research methods which register the uneven distributions of air quality and the relationships between atmospheric sensing, feeling, and political action. This emerging approach offers new avenues for air quality research and seeds future-focused ideas for understanding and enhancing atmospheric wellbeing through creative means.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}